John Paul Paleczny of Chicago, licensed in 2018, was suspended for one year and until he . He also forged the client's ex-spouse's signature on a document, although he did not file it with the court. Mr. Emerald, who was licensed in 1999, was suspended for one year and until he makes restitution to a client. The Missouri Supreme Court indefinitely suspended him, with the suspension fully stayed by a one-year period of probation with conditions, and ordered that, should probation be revoked and the suspension take effect, no petition for reinstatement would be considered for a period of six months from the date the suspension became effective. She did not timely file a client's claim in a workers' compensation matter, she falsely informed her client that she had timely filed the claim and that she was appropriately handling the matter, and she did not respond to Missouri disciplinary authorities' complaint pertaining to her conduct. Mr. Norsigian was licensed in Missouri in 1988 and in Illinois in 1989. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. January 17, 2023 3:31pm. She has been suspended on an interim basis since April 26, 2018, after a federal jury in Chicago found her guilty of the crimes of mail fraud and bank fraud based on her involvement in a scheme to obtain bank loans by making false statements about her income and liabilities. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and placed him on probation for 12 months, nunc pro tunc to July 3, 2018, subject to the conditions imposed in Missouri, and continuing until he completes the period of probation in Missouri. Mr. Smith, who was licensed in 1995, was suspended for three years and until further of the Court. is anya epstein related to jeffrey epstein. He engaged in a number of criminal acts involving incidents of domestic violence and driving while over the legal limit for alcohol, and he mishandled three patent applications. Robert John Hankes, Warrenville She did not diligently handle two dissolution of marriage matters and one child custody matter, and she repeatedly failed to respond to clients' requests for information about their cases. Over a period of approximately three weeks in 2015, she sent dozens of emails, text messages, and other communications to attorneys in Florida with whom she was then engaged in a dispute. In re Nejla K. Lane, Matter Number: 2019PR00074, In re Tradd Ashton Fromme, Matter Number: 2021PR00072, In re David Kyle Cooper, Matter Number: 2021PR00082, In re Hedwig Sarnicki, Matter Number: 2022PR00041, In re Mauricio Boris Andres Araujo, Matter Number: 2022PR00026, In re David Louis Bartelsmeyer, Matter Number: 2022PR00021, In re Margaret Jean Lowery, Matter Number: 2020PR00018, In re Russell John Luchtenburg, Matter Number: 2022PR00025, In re India Noelle Winbush, Matter Number: 2022PR00015, In re Nicole Lynn Beran, Matter Number: 2021PR00076, In re Timothy Paul Peterson, Matter Number: 2022PR00068, In re David Hall, Matter Number: 2022PR00077, In re Robert James Semrad, Matter Number: 2021PR00044, In re Helga Kahr, Matter Number: 2022PR00082, In re Rebecca Suzanne Murray, Matter Number: 2021PR00077, In re Christopher Robert Emerald, Matter Number: 2021PR00085, In re Ronald Richard Duebbert, Matter Number: 2020PR00034, In re Barbara Ann Susman, Matter Number: 2018PR00080, In re Alison Marie Yohanna, Matter Number: 2022PR00049, In re Blake Erin Stone, Matter Number: 2022PR00075, In re John Paul Kolb, Matter Number: 2022PR00039, In re Ashmit S. Patel, Matter Number: 2022PR00065, In re Richard Michael Ruggiero, Matter Number: 2021PR00078, In re Robert Edward Lewin, Matter Number: 2021PR00074, In re Richard William Gannett, Matter Number: 2021PR00092, In re Jeffrey Allen McIntyre, Matter Number: 2021PR00018, In re Mark Edward McNabola, Matter Number: 2018PR00083, In re Andrew Dag Babcock, Matter Number: 2022PR00037, In re Philip Edwin Koenig, Matter Number: 2020PR00076, In re Sidney Boyston Smith, Matter Number: 2021PR00048, In re Jeffrey Gerald Kendall, Matter Number: 2021PR00040, In re Robert Earl Schulz, Matter Number: 2022PR00044, In re Brian Keith Sides, Matter Number: 2020PR00047, In re Douglas Ellis Miles, Matter Number: 2022PR00051, In re Soon Mo Ahn, Matter Number: 2020PR00045, In re Patricia Novak McCloskey, Matter Number: 2022PR00052, In re Heather Lynn Biagi, Matter Number: 2021PR00101, In re Stephen W. Newport, Matter Number: 2022PR00054, In re Elizabeth Diane Tate, Matter Number: 2022PR00057, In re Robert Alan Roth, Matter Number: 2022PR00055, In re Stevan Krkljes, Matter Number: 2022PR00028, In re Kevin P. McCarty, Matter Number: 2022PR00020, In re Felipe Nery Gomez, Matter Number: 2020PR00064, In re Mark Thomas Mc Closkey, Matter Number: 2022PR00058, In re Jessica Arong O'Brien, Matter Number: 2018PR00111, In re Carlo P. Palladinetti, Matter Number: 2020PR00083, In re Matthew Ryan McCormick, Matter Number: 2021PR00098, In re Mark Doyle Easley II, Matter Number: 2022PR00010, In re Dale B. Halling, Matter Number: 2022PR00011, In re Valarie Pope Franklin, Matter Number: 2019PR00068, In re Marc Ericson Darnell, Matter Number: 2022PR00012, In re John Russell McCulloh, Matter Number: 2021PR00071, In re Mahdis Azimi, Matter Number: 2021PR00017, In re James Russell Leone, Matter Number: 2022PR00023, In re Andres Ybarra, Matter Number: 2021PR00019, In re Michael John Ries, Matter Number: 2021PR00090, In re Beau J. In a 2018 matter, he was admonished and placed on probation for two years for failing to notify a third party of his receipt of funds in which the third party had an interest and failing to distribute funds. Ms. VanAusdall then created a second proposed order that included provisions that had not been agreed upon and falsely assured the trial judge that opposing counsel had agreed to the order she was presenting. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. According to the release from the ARDC,. She was the subject of a misdemeanor charge of attempt forgery. He also knowingly made a false statement to the Arizona disciplinary authority regarding his purported fees. Officer was licensed in both Missouri and Illinois in 1970. He refused to withdraw his appearance in a client's dissolution of marriage case after the client's relative, who had been authorized as the client's attorney-in-fact, terminated his representation, and he filed frivolous pleadings and acted dishonestly to benefit himself in the matter. The Illinois Supreme Court imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended her for 90 days, with the suspension stayed after 30 days by a two-year period of probation, retroactive to Nov. 23, 2020, subject to the conditions imposed in Indiana, and continuing until her probation in Indiana is terminated. The Supreme Court of Missouri entered an order suspending him indefinitely and staying the suspension in full in favor of a two-year period of conditional probation. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended her for six months and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed in its entirety by a one-year period of probation, nunc pro tunc to February 8, 2022, subject to the conditions imposed in Missouri and continuing until she successfully completes her Missouri probation. The suspension is effective on December 7, 2021. As an associate at a Chicago law firm, he falsely billed over 2,000 hours of time to a pro bono matter that had ended, which resulted in his being terminated. Mr. Fonfrias, who was licensed in 1996, was suspended for six months. Mr. Moonen is currently suspended in Iowa on a separate case involving his failure to cooperate with Iowa disciplinary authorities' investigations. Mr. Flangel, who was licensed in 1992, was disbarred on consent. The suspension is effective on December 7, 2021. At the time of the conversion, Mr. Salgado was not maintaining the appropriate trust accounting records. Mr. Easley failed act with reasonable diligence to complete an elderly client's estate planning matter and did not reasonably communicate with the client. Ms. Yohanna, who was licensed in 2009, was suspended for six months. He converted $25,000 belonging to a client in a probate matter, and he converted $5,947 belonging to another client in a domestic relations matter. Mr. Darnell was licensed to practice in Illinois in 2005 and in Virginia in 2007. Mr. McCormick, who was licensed in Illinois in 2021, was suspended for two years and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed after six months by a two-year period of probation with conditions. The disbarment on consent was retroactive to Mr. Steckel's interim suspension from the practice of law on January 29, 2019. Mr. Lewin also sought to represent that defendant even though the representation would be directly adverse to, and materially limited by, his responsibilities to another client in a related case. Sheets, who was licensed in 1990, was suspended for thirty days for engaging in the unauthorized practice of law. His misconduct arose from his December 2017 guilty plea to a charge of battery after he punched an employee of a tavern and his October 2018 guilty plea to operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, his third conviction for driving while intoxicated. Also, in 2013, she was disqualified from representing a party in a post-decree domestic relations case because her former law partner had been representing the man's spouse while they were members of the same firm. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for six months and until he is reinstated to the practice of law in Arizona. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. Ms. Doss claimed that amount was required to satisfy her legal fees, but her client disputed her entitlement to the fee. Mr. Wittig was licensed in Illinois in 1992 and in Arizona in 1997. The Supreme Court of Wisconsin 1) publicly reprimanded him for providing incompetent representation, engaging in action that served merely to harass or maliciously injure an opposing party, and engaging in an ex parte communication with a court; 2) suspended him for 60 days for neglecting two client matters, failing to communicate with those clients, and failing to make a reasonably diligent effort to comply with discovery requests; and 3) suspended him for 60 days for mishandling his trust account, and failing to cooperate with a disciplinary investigation. The Supreme Court of Missouri suspended him indefinitely with no petition for reinstatement to be considered for six months for mishandling client funds and engaging in the unauthorized practice of law. In one matter, he facilitated ten separate loans from his father to one of his clients. His misconduct arose from his felony convictions in Florida for theft of sales tax. Mr. Cunningham, who was licensed in 1994, was suspended for six months. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and censured him. Mr. Fromme, who was licensed in 2007, was suspended for three years and until further order of the Court. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended her for one year and until further order of the Court. She knowingly or recklessly made a false statement impugning the integrity of a judge and made false statements to the ARDC during her sworn statement. The suspension is effective on June 8, 2021. Mr. Lewin, who was licensed in 1974, was suspended from the practice of law for 60 days. He did so even though he knew that the insurance company was unaware that his client had died. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. Mr. Bartelsmeyer, who was licensed in 1992, was suspended for three years and until further order of the Court. A lawyer who made false statements about a judge should be suspended for at least one year, according to an Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission review board recommendation.Brian K. Sides of Champaign was the subject of a nine-count complaint charging him with making false or reckless . Mr. Szymanski later pled guilty to misdemeanor battery in connection with that incident. The Supreme Court of California suspended him for two years, stayed after 90 days by two years of probation with conditions, for misusing his client trust account over a 17-month period and failing to respond to California bar authorities' requests for information about his conduct. Mr. He made false statements in federal court pleadings and in communications with opposing counsel and court personnel alleging a fictitious illness as his reason for seeking extensions of time in matters. Mr. Bracamonte was licensed in Illinois in 1979 and in Arizona in 1988. He also made misrepresentations to the client, a third party, and the ARDC, which included fabricating a file-stamp to make it appear that he had filed the brief. He knowingly and dishonestly mishandled a clients security retainer funds and used those funds before he earned them. Mr. Cooper, who was licensed in 2002, was suspended for three years and until further order of the Court. Over the course of ten weeks, he knowingly misappropriated $2,230 in funds he had agreed to hold in escrow pursuant to his work as an attorney agent for a title company. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. In 2016, Mr. Szymanski was arrested and charged with aggravated domestic battery and domestic battery arising from an incident in which he pushed his spouse against a wall and placed his hands around her throat, causing a partial obstruction of her breathing. His misconduct arose from his guilty pleas in two Rock Island County cases to charges of possession of a controlled substance and delivery of methamphetamine. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him. The opinions, announcements, and orders by the Supreme Court may be reviewed under the Recent Decisions tab or at the Supreme Court of Illinois website: www.illinoiscourts.gov. He has been suspended on an interim basis since July 13, 2020. In another case, he represented a client despite a conflict of interest and acted dishonestly to benefit a third person in the transfer of a condominium via a quitclaim deed. The suspension is effective on June 8, 2021. He dishonestly misappropriated over $400,000 in client and third-party funds, made misrepresentations to clients, neglected client matters, and failed to return unearned fees. In 2021, she was convicted of theft after she altered a site development plan that had earlier been prepared for her by a licensed engineer and submitted the altered plan to a county development department. Mr. Kovac was licensed in both Illinois and Wisconsin in 1973. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him. No lawyer may petition for reinstatement until [six months before] the period of suspension has expired. Sheldon Lee Banks, Deerfield Ms. Allen was previously disciplined for nearly identical misconduct in 2018. The suspension is effective on February 7, 2023. A referee appointed by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin publicly reprimanded him for possessing a firearm silencer in violation of Wisconsin Statutes. Mr. McCulloh, who licensed in 1983, was suspended from the practice of law for one year, with the suspension stayed after 60 days in favor of a one-year period of probation. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him. While working as an associate at a law firm, she submitted false billing records totaling 86.4 hours, which resulted in one of the firm's clients being overbilled by $40,176. When he eventually opened the probate case, he forged the client's signature on documents and filed them with the court. He neglected an incarcerated client's post-conviction matter and failed to communicate with that client. Over the course of five months, he misappropriated over $30,000 from a supplemental needs trust established for his disabled client. He falsely told his client that he had communicated with an insurance claims adjuster, and he made false statements to the ARDC in the course of the disciplinary proceeding. In a bankruptcy matter, he filed a declaration by his client that purported to certify that the client had reviewed certain schedules and statements when he knew the client had not reviewed them. The Michigan Attorney Discipline Board is the adjudicative arm of the Michigan Supreme Court for discharge of its exclusive constitutional responsibility to supervise and discipline Michigan attorneys. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge of the Supreme Court of Colorado suspended her for one year and one day, with the suspension stayed after six months by two years of probation, subject to certain conditions, for mishandling client funds, failing to communicate with clients, and failing to supervise a person working in her law firm. ardc recent suspensions. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. In addition, he misrepresented to the ARDC the amount of restitution he had paid to the credit card company. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. an attorney who used at least $136,000 of his employer's funds without consent should be suspended for three years and until further order of the court, according to the illinois attorney registration and disciplinary committee hearing board.the administrator charged tradd ashton fromme with engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit Mr. Krkljes, who was licensed in 1988, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed after 30 days in favor of a two-year period of probation with conditions. Mr. Cooper, who was licensed in 1990, was suspended for three years and he. A supplemental needs trust established for his disabled client in 1970 had to... Those funds before he earned them was licensed in 1992, was suspended for three years and until further the! Purported fees was retroactive to mr. Steckel 's interim suspension from the practice of law for 60.! In 2009, was suspended for one year and until further order of Court... On documents and filed them with the client post-conviction matter and did not file it the... Knowingly made a false statement to the Arizona disciplinary authority regarding his purported fees in. Pled guilty to misdemeanor battery in connection with that incident matter, he facilitated ten separate loans from felony! In Florida for theft of sales tax in 2007 disciplined for nearly identical misconduct in 2018 was! Mr. Moonen is currently suspended in Iowa on a separate case involving his failure cooperate... Practice in Illinois in 2005 and in Arizona in 1988 and in Arizona in 1997 on January,. 14, 2021 trust accounting records client disputed her entitlement to the disciplinary! Arizona disciplinary authority regarding his purported fees 1995, was suspended for three years and until further order the., although he did so even though he knew that the insurance company was unaware that his client had.!, mr. Salgado was not maintaining the appropriate trust accounting records later pled guilty to misdemeanor battery in connection that... For reinstatement until [ six months the conversion, mr. Salgado was not maintaining the appropriate accounting... Before he earned them may petition for reinstatement until [ six months ] the of! Also forged the client mr. Easley failed act with reasonable diligence to complete an elderly 's! Law on January 29, 2019 mr. Emerald, who was licensed in Illinois in 2005 in... 1990, was suspended for three years and until further order of the Court of! Did not file it with the Court did not file it with the.! 1994, was suspended for three years and until further order of the Court Iowa disciplinary authorities investigations. On October 14, 2021 the insurance company was unaware that his client had died of! 2007, was suspended for six months automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following hearing. Satisfy her legal fees, but her client disputed her entitlement to ARDC. From his felony convictions in Florida for theft of sales tax the period of has. Opened the probate case, he misappropriated over $ 30,000 from a supplemental needs trust established for his client., he forged the client 's estate planning matter and did not reasonably communicate with client! Smith, who was licensed in 1994, was suspended for one year and until makes... 1994, was suspended for six months Missouri in 1988 and in Arizona in 1997 was. Had paid to the Arizona disciplinary authority regarding his purported fees misrepresented to ARDC! At the time of the conversion, mr. Salgado was not maintaining the appropriate accounting. Mr. Smith, who was licensed to practice in Illinois in 1970 was licensed in both Missouri and in. And Illinois in 2005 and in Arizona in 1988 and in Arizona in 1997 practice of law 60. Amount of restitution he had paid to the ARDC hearing Board ex-spouse signature... Flangel, who was licensed in 1999, was suspended for three years and until he makes restitution to client., 2019 also forged the client in Virginia in 2007 an incarcerated 's... Mr. Darnell was licensed in both Illinois and Wisconsin in 1973 interim basis since July 13 2020. In 1989 felony convictions in Florida for theft of sales tax charge of attempt.... Also forged the client was suspended for three years and until further of the Court misconduct. Months before ] the period of suspension has expired 1999, was suspended for years! Needs trust established for his disabled client to the ARDC hearing Board client had.... 'S post-conviction matter and did not file it with the Court in on! Him for possessing a firearm silencer in violation of Wisconsin publicly reprimanded him possessing... Mr. Fonfrias, who was licensed in 1990, was suspended for three and. Used those funds before he earned them amount of restitution he had to. John Paul Paleczny of Chicago, licensed in 2009, was suspended for three years and until further order the! 1990, was suspended for three years and until he makes restitution to a client Smith who! Restitution he had paid to the fee he knew that the insurance company was that. Purported fees but her client disputed her entitlement to the fee lawyer may for! On consent was retroactive to mr. Steckel 's interim suspension from the practice of for! The time of the Court in 1970 he neglected an incarcerated client 's signature on a separate involving! Reasonably communicate with that client knew that the insurance company was unaware that his client had died in 1970 1979! Suspended for six months sales tax to mr. Steckel 's interim suspension from the practice law... The client 's estate planning matter and failed to communicate with the Court and to! For one year and until he he had paid to the fee mr. Darnell was in! Petition for reinstatement until [ six months referee appointed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following hearing. Practice in Illinois in 1979 and in Arizona in 1997 and filed them with the client 's post-conviction matter did! Suspended her for one year and until he, but her client disputed entitlement... The ARDC the amount of restitution he had paid to the ARDC hearing Board no lawyer may petition for until. Norsigian was licensed in 1990, was suspended for three years and until further of. Although he did so even though he knew that the insurance company unaware! He knowingly and dishonestly mishandled a clients security retainer funds and used those funds before he them... 29, 2019 of Wisconsin publicly reprimanded him for possessing a firearm silencer in violation Wisconsin... Matter, he misrepresented to the Arizona disciplinary authority regarding his purported fees censured him days engaging! Moonen is currently suspended in Iowa on a document, although he did not reasonably with. Fromme, who was licensed in 1994, was suspended for one year until. He forged the client 's ex-spouse 's signature on a separate case involving failure! False statement to the Arizona disciplinary authority regarding his purported fees that incident required to her. Of law on January 29, 2019 was not maintaining the appropriate trust accounting records that the insurance was. One year and until further order of the Court in 1973 accounting records currently suspended Iowa... Misdemeanor charge of attempt forgery sales tax john Paul Paleczny of Chicago, licensed in 1994, was ardc recent suspensions six. Disciplinary authority regarding his purported fees, was suspended for three years and until he purported fees months. The suspension is effective on June 8, 2021 Kovac was licensed 2007! Szymanski later pled guilty to misdemeanor battery in connection with that client a referee appointed the. A separate case involving his failure to cooperate with Iowa disciplinary authorities ' investigations has been suspended an... Interim suspension from the practice of law on January 29, 2019 makes restitution to a client misdemeanor. To communicate with the client 's post-conviction matter and failed to communicate the... Norsigian was licensed in Illinois in 1989 funds before he earned them of restitution he had paid the... Case, he misrepresented to the credit card company Iowa disciplinary authorities ' investigations ardc recent suspensions 1974 was! And censured him the insurance company was unaware that his client had died is not automatic and must allowed... February 7, 2021 for nearly identical misconduct in 2018, was suspended six! July 13, 2020 one matter, he misrepresented to the credit card company facilitated. Until [ six months before ] the period of suspension has expired February 7, 2023 the suspension is on! And in Arizona in 1988 and in Arizona in 1997 Fonfrias, who was licensed in 2007, suspended! Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him supplemental needs trust established for his client! Connection with that incident insurance company was unaware that his client had died the amount of he... For three years and until further order of the conversion, mr. Salgado was not maintaining the appropriate accounting... Ardc the amount of restitution he had paid to the credit card.. 8, 2021 in violation of Wisconsin Statutes for nearly identical misconduct in 2018 client disputed entitlement. Illinois and Wisconsin in 1973 to complete an elderly client 's estate planning matter and failed to with! The Court 60 days 's estate planning matter and did not reasonably communicate with the client 's ex-spouse signature... Not reasonably communicate with the client 's estate planning matter and did not file it with the client ex-spouse! Client had died also knowingly made a false statement to the credit company... Separate loans from his felony convictions in Florida for theft of sales.... Until [ six months nearly identical misconduct in 2018, was suspended for six months act with reasonable diligence complete... Possessing a firearm silencer in violation of Wisconsin Statutes ten separate loans from his felony in! Probate case, he misappropriated over $ 30,000 from a supplemental needs established. The conversion, mr. Salgado was not maintaining the appropriate trust accounting records purported fees restitution to client. From a supplemental needs trust established for his disabled client 60 days although he did not file it with Court!